Call to Action: California Exemption Improvements Coming Up For Vote This Week

English: Seal of the Senate of California

English: Seal of the Senate of California (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Senator Bob Wieckowski has introduced a bill in the California State Senate that provides significant improvements to our current exemptions including:

  • Increasing the homestead to $300,000 for all individuals
  • Removing the 6 month reinvestment requirement
  • Increasing the exemption for vehicles to $6000
  • Establishing that bankruptcy alone is not an event of default
  • Creating a grubstake of $5000 for self-employed individuals, etc.

We need you to contact your state senator this week to voice strong support for this bill!

Here are the easy steps you can take to show your support:

  1. Visit and enter your home address to determine who your CA state senator is.
  2. Using our template letter of support below, “CA AB 308 Attorney Letter of Support,” address your letter to your senator and fill in the fields in red.
  3. Submit your letter via email or fax. To fax, please refer to the fax number listed in your state senator’s website.
  4. To email your letter – which we recommend – please refer to the chart below for your senator’s Chief of Staff. Email your letter to this individual by using this email address format:
  5. Please also email a copy of your letter to Julie Seger at so we can track which senators have been contacted and by whom.
  6. If you have any questions or difficulties with identifying your senator or sending your letter to their office, please contact Julie at and she will be happy to assist you.

Thank you for your support!




Ben Allen

Colleen Beamish



Anderson, Joel

Collin Mcglashen



Pat Bates

Kevin Bassett



Beall, Jim

Sunshine Borelli



Berryhill, Tom

Laura Ortega



Block, Marty

Margaret Pena



Cannella, Anthony

Brett Michelin



DeLeon, Kevin

Dan Reeves



Fuller, Jean

Julie Sauls



Gaines, Ted

Steve Davey



Galgiani, Cathleen

Trent Hager



Hall, Isadore

Terry Schanz



Hancock, Loni

Hans Hemann



Hernandez, Ed

Tim Valderama



Hertzberg, Bob

Dianne Griffths



Hill, Jerry

Nathan Solov



Hueso, Ben

Ana Molina-Rodriquez



Huff, Bob

Junay Gardner



Jackson, Hanna-Beth

Jennifer Richard



Lara, Ricardo

Erika Contreras



Leno, Mark

Bob Hartnagel



Leyva, Connie

Cori Ayala



Liu, Carol

Susanne Reed



McGuire, Mike

Jason Liles



Mendoza, Tony

Eusevio Padilla



Mitchell, Holly

Tiffani Alvidrez



Monning, William

Jodi Fujii



Morrell, Mike

Mark Timmerman



Nguyen, Janet

Mark Reeder



Nielsen, Jim

David Reade



Pan, Richard

Crystal Strait



Pavley, Fran

Liz Fenton



Roth, Richard D.

Chuck Dalldorf



Stone, Jeff

Chris Wysocki



Vidak, Andy

Jim Kjol



Wieckowski, Bob

Derek Chernow



Wolk, Lois

Craig Reynolds











CA AB 308 Attorney Letter of Support (Template)

May XX, 2015


Senator NAME

California State Senate

State Capitol

Sacramento, CA 95814

Re: S.B. 308


Dear Senator NAME:

As a CITY, California bankruptcy attorney, constituent, and member of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys (“NACBA”) I am writing to express my strong support for S.B. 308, introduced by Sen. Wieckowski.

As a California bankruptcy attorney, I work with clients every day who continue to struggle in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis and great recession, which continues to present serious challenges for our state’s honest, hardworking men and women. Long-term unemployment and underemployment have devastated the financial health of families throughout the state. For these families who face collection lawsuits, home foreclosures, and garnished wages, bankruptcy is the final and best hope for protecting most basic household assets and modest incomes. S.B. 308 is an important piece of the legislative protections desperately needed by those families struggling to recover from the downturn and restructuring of our economy.

I urge you to support S.B. 308 as it enhances protections for Californians in financial distress. S.B. 308, in a measured manner, increases values of certain types of personal property that may be retained by a bankruptcy debtor. Importantly, this Bill would create a new, modest exemption to help small business owners get their fresh start. Specifically, it would allow small business owners to claim up to a total of $5,000 for cash or deposit accounts, accounts receivable, and business inventory for those debtors using the exemptions under CCP § 704, et. seq.

Unfortunately, under current law, while wage-earners can exempt paid and unpaid earnings under CCP § 704, there is no corresponding protection available for small business debtors. Adding this new protection for small business owners will allow them to retain a modest amount of assets which are essential to resume business operations. This change is particularly important given the fact that many underemployed workers attempt to start home-based businesses in order to put food on the family table.

S.B. 308 also importantly addresses California’s presently inadequate designations for homestead exemptions. Past legislative increases in the homestead dollar amounts have fallen dramatically behind the increased cost of housing in California. Consequently, the current homestead exemption fails to achieve its purpose – to provide protection from creditors for a typical home in California. However, S.B.308 would, in fact, increase the value of the exemption to more accurately reflect the rising cost of housing today.

In conclusion, I strongly support this effort to strengthen the safety net for so many Californians who are struggling as they face today’s challenging and changing economy. As a bankruptcy attorney, NACBA member, and California resident, I urge to you to support S.B. 308 as a responsible approach to improving the conditions of financially distressed Californians in need of the “fresh start” bankruptcy can provide.






John’s Installation as President of the Santa Clara County Bar Association

We are honored to share that our founding attorney, John Mlnarik, was installed last week as President of the Santa Clara County Bar Association, which represents approximately 3,400 attorneys in Santa Clara County. 

Congratulations to John SCCBAOathas well as the other SCCBA officers! -TMLG



How Filing Bankruptcy in 2013 Provides Enhanced Asset-Protection

Happy New Year! New Year New Life

Many individuals will start the New Year resolving to improve their financial affairs. Though bankruptcy is a great tool, which generally includes benefits such as the discharge of credit card and medical debt, a new exemption scheme, effective January 1, 2013, will give potential filers even more to be excited about.

Exemption Basics

A key protection offered by the Bankruptcy Code is found in Section 522. This section details a debtor’s rights regarding exempt property—property that is shielded from liquidation.

Exemptions are statutory provisions that generally protect individual assets from liquidation based on an assigned dollar value. For example, pursuant to CCP § 703.140(b)(3), debtors are permitted to shield up to $600 per “household” item.  In other words, you can prevent creditors from seizing any of your appliances or furnishings if they are worth less than $600/item.  Under CCP § 703.140(b)(2), you can shield up to $4,800 of the fair market value of your motor vehicle.  There are numerous exemptions that apply in different contexts and can even apply in conjunction with each other.  A vehicle that is valued at $6,000 can be fully protected by combining the Motor Vehicle (b)(2) exemption with the “Grubstake” (b)(5) exemption (see below).

The bottom line is that a careful application of the exemption statutes can often allow debtors to retain their assets during and after a bankruptcy filing.

The 2013 Exemptions

The assigned exemption values change every three years to account for inflation. On January 1, 2013 a new exemption scheme became effective allowing debtors to take advantage of even stronger protections. Whereas a person filing for bankruptcy protection in California on December 20, 2012 would have been able to exempt up to $23,250 in “any property” under CCP § 703.140(b)(5) & (1), a debtor that filed on January 15, 2013 would have been able to exempt up to $25,340 under the same statutes—a $2,090 difference!

More Than a “Fresh Start”

The Bankruptcy Code and the attendant exemptions were created to give filers a “fresh start.”  They were designed with the idea that a person free from burdensome debt would be a more productive member of society.  But the protections offered by the exemptions, particularly the new valuations, provide more than a fresh start—they provide an invaluable tool and an opportunity.  Instead of rewinding and requiring individuals to begin their lives anew, the exemption scheme allows debtors to carry on—without the worry of losing invaluable possessions.

-Caroline M. Reebs, Attorney-at-Law

Financial Crisis and Bankruptcy: Don’t Fear “Fear Itself”


This gallery contains 2 photos.

BOO!! It’s that time of year again — when the days get shorter and darker, the leaves fall, a cold wind blows, and our thoughts might turn to mortality as we reflect upon another summer come and gone. In fact, … Continue reading

Debunking Myths About Bankruptcy and Retirement


This gallery contains 1 photo.

Happy Seniors’ Day! Debunking Myths About Bankruptcy and Retirement Recent reports highlight an alarming trend:  an increasing number of seniors are burdened by credit card debt and are facing foreclosure.  In fact, according to a University of Michigan Law School … Continue reading

Spring Forward! Don’t Fall Back…

My favorite holiday is here again: the weekend when Daylight Saving Time returns and, suddenly, the sun is up an extra hour every evening.

What?  It’s NOT a holiday?  Well, as far as I’m concerned it is.  After the dreariness of winter’s long nights (peaking on December 5th, when the sun sets the earliest by our clocks, though if you use a sundial it’s December 21st), the gradual increase in the day’s length isn’t fast enough for me.  I truly celebrate the day when, as if by magic, it’s still light out an hour later than it was the day before.

This “holiday” is so cheerful that even its mnemonic device is optimistic!  “Spring Forward — Don’t Fall Back.”  Who could disagree with THAT?

Sometimes, alas, you reach a point in your life when it seems like Fall Back, Fall Back — even in brightest sunshine.  For example, maybe illness, unemployment, an underwater mortgage, or something else has led you to run up debts you’re never going to be able to pay off.  Interest keeps accruing, collectors keep calling, monthly bills keep arriving.

If so, don’t despair; the law allows you to Spring Forward again and force the debt collectors to Fall Back while you receive a fresh start:


Yes, the word sounds a little scary, and yes the benefits of bankruptcy are partly offset by the requirement to give full disclosure of one’s financial position (and perhaps by a period of bad credit).  But other than that, it couldn’t be better; and even though there are some debts that don’t go away (some student loans, some income taxes, unpaid spousal and child support, to name a few), getting rid of all the rest makes it much easier to finally pay everything off.

What are some of the other benefits?

  • The great anxiety of seemingly insurmountable debt no longer haunts the debtor; she can get on with her life and start saving for the future.
  • Creditors can’t sue the debtor.
  • Most unsecured debt will vanish.
  • The debtor can begin building up a good credit rating again.
  • In a few years it is almost as if the bad times never happened at all.

For most people, bankruptcy takes one of two forms: Chapter 7 or Chapter 13.  Chances are, if someone has few assets and not much income, Chapter 7 will be the appropriate route; for those who can count on a good future income and/or own valuable assets, Chapter 13 is more likely.  For the most part, it’s up to the debtor, but Chapter 7 is unavailable to those who have too much income (which varies depending on the case), and Chapter 13 is off-limits for those who have too much debt (more than $360,000 unsecured or $1,080,000 secured debt).

Chapter 7 allows people to rid themselves of all debt, except a few categories such as those mentioned above.  Debtors agree to liquidate almost all their assets, but in California they’re allowed to choose $23,000 of assets to keep — even if that’s all they have.  In some cases, debtors can use gifts from friends and family to keep more than $23,000-worth by “paying” (in effect) for the surplus.  They’re protected in the meantime by the automatic “stay” until the discharge is entered, so creditors can’t bother them.  These provisions help debtors hold onto their car and remain in their home while they look for less expensive alternatives.

Chapter 13 provides protection from creditors as long as the debtor sticks to a payment plan during a period ranging from three to five years.  Debtors are excused from almost all unsecured debt (that means credit cards, for one thing).  However, they are obliged to settle up with creditors who hold secured debt (usually, that’s the debt for a house or car).  Like Chapter 7, Chapter 13 in California allows debtors to keep $23,000 of their property while liquidating the rest.  However, they don’t have to liquidate everything: in effect they’re allowed to “buy” their property from the estate.  If, say, the debtor’s two cars together are worth more than $23,000, the Chapter 13 plan can provide that unsecured creditors will be paid what they would otherwise have received in a Chapter 7 liquidation.

If this is the season for you to Spring Forward after too long Falling Back, regain this weekend’s missing hour by spending it in an initial consultation with the Mlnarik Law Group.  We’ll be there to help you let a lot more sunshine into your life.

- Jim Erickson, Associate Attorney


Bankruptcy Law and Policy: Good for the Few, Good for the Many

Photo courtesy of
John Perrott hanged at Smithfield

England passed the first modern bankruptcy law during the reign of that lovable old curmudgeon, Henry VIII.  The law’s purpose?  Make sure no one could ever fail to pay back a loan without severe consequences.  In other words, only one social purpose was served:  repayment of creditors — or else.

Although several American colonies and later states experimented with a more rational and humane approach (at a time when bankruptcy was still punishable by death in Merry Olde England), not until 1841 did the USA (or any nation) pass a bankruptcy law whose intent included an equitable system for discharge of debt.  Although England in 1705 began to allow discharge, the central purpose was still relief for creditors; in no way did the law reflect any humanitarian concern (or even sound social policy) regarding debtors.

The 1841 law was short-lived, but both the federal government and individual states kept experimenting, now and then, with variations.  Finally, following the catastrophic Depression of the mid-1890s, in 1898 a modern federal bankruptcy law was passed, and there’s been one (but not the same one) ever since.

In a way, that’s surprising.  One hundred and fourteen years is a long time for laws with the same basic premise to survive without serious opposition.  Obviously, it is the “common sense” of our nation that society as a whole benefits from allowing individuals to get a fresh start, rather than spend the rest of their lives paying off creditors.

But it’s even more surprising, in retrospect, that it took an entrepreneurial nation like ours more than a century before finally putting the law in place.  After all, the United States is built on the idea of encouraging individual risk, i.e., experimentation in launching businesses with the sober knowledge that a majority of new small businesses fail.  Without bankruptcy laws, far fewer Americans would be willing to take the risks and invest the personal savings that, combined, have given us the most dynamic and innovative business environment in history.

And even with respect to those (like me) who have no entrepreneurial talent, the existence of the bankruptcy code benefits society as a whole.  Think about it:  how motivated would individual workers be if, due to some financial disaster, they had to spend the rest of their lives working only to hand the paycheck over to creditors?  That’s far worse than even indentured servitude, which at least was limited to periods of about seven years.  We value an incentivized work force because it’s more productive and it’s healthier, psychologically, than the alternative.

In this respect, consider the recent housing bubble and the cataclysm of September 2008 through March 2009.  Without the option of bankruptcy, untold numbers would be stuck paying off their underwater mortgages (while no longer living in their old houses) for, possibly, the rest of their lives.  An entire generation of productive citizens would be reduced to conduits for the transfer of paychecks to creditors.  Instead, all of us benefit by allowing these people a way OUT so that they are motivated to remain IN a productive workforce.  It’s good for the few and good for the many.

Obviously, we’ve come a long way since Henry VIII (who perhaps inspired British poet Rudyard Kipling to write, “If you can keep your head when all about you / Are losing theirs and blaming it on you …”).  And we’re talking about losing your shirt, not your head.  But to sentence the risk-taking part of the workforce to a lifetime of mindless, motivationless labor, with no inspiration and innovation, is effectively to decapitate the economy.  Fortunately, back in 1898 a lot of congressmen had a good head on their shoulders — and regarding debtors, our nation no longer has collectively lost its mind.

by Jim Erickson, Associate Attorney

Policy descriptions by John Mlnarik

(Photo courtesy of

Seeing Your Shadow in the Form of an Identity Thief? Here’s What to Do.

Groundhog Day AGAIN? Why, it seems like the last one was just yesterday …

Of course, I’m referring to the classic Bill Murray romantic comedy. Bill plays a TV weatherman covering Punxsutawney Phil‘s annual moment in the sun (or the shade). The “next” day, the hapless reporter discovers that every day is Groundhog Day, over and over again.

But if there’s anything worse than being the same person on the same eternal day, it’s being a different person EVERY day. That’s what it’s like if you’re a victim of Identity Theft — and it’s neither romantic nor a comedy.

If someone steals your name, birth date, social security number and so on, you could find yourself on the wrong end of a lawsuit when creditors try to collect the debts the thief has run up. Meanwhile, your hard-earned credit score could take a big hit.

Even before you contact an attorney, there are a few things you should do yourself.

1.  Above all, file a police report.  Some stations let you file online, but if that’s not an option, speak in person to an officer or deputy and let them know that the law requires you to file a report.  (And here we should digress:  one peculiarity of some identity theft laws is that you are not defined as a “victim” of identity theft until you file a police report!  Yes, that’s a strange definition of the word “victim,” but it lets the authorities know you are serious and not just claiming that the dog ate your homework.)

2.  Make a photocopy of your driver license or other state-issued ID.

3.  Photocopy a recent utility bill with your current address on it.

4.  Write a statement describing the particulars of the theft and your attempt to report it to the creditor and its attorney.  For example, if your theft involved a credit card, give the credit card name and account number, and say how much was fraudulently charged and for how long. Also supply your social security number and phone number. If your address has changed since either a) your ID was issued, or b) some or all of the theft occurred, give the dates you moved and any additional interim addresses. Finally, above your signature, write: “I certify the representations made are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact.”

Got that?  OK, gather it together with a cover letter stating that you are reporting the information as a “Request that Creditor be Notified of Identity Theft Under 15 USC Section 1681c-2“, which should also be the statement in the “re” line at the top of your letter template. Then send it all to the following addresses (accurate as of February 2012):

Equifax Security Freeze
P.O. Box 105788
Atlanta, Georgia 30348

Experian Security Freeze
P.O. Box 9554
Allen TX 75013

TransUnion Fraud Victim Assistance Department
P.O. Box 6790
Fullerton CA 92834

Also, send copies to the creditor (or, if the debt has been repackaged, to the debt collector who contacted you), and send yet another set of copies to any attorney who has contacted you in an attempt to collect the debt. At the bottom of the template copy (since every letter will be the same except for the address to which it’s sent), put a “cc” indicating all the places you’ll send the cover letter and copies.

Having done all the necessary “self-help” work, it may be necessary to contact an attorney. In fact, if you are being sued, you must answer the suit (usually within 30 days) and also, if advisable, file a cross-complaint with your answer. The cross-complaint enables you to request damages from the debt collector (sometimes including attorney fees) if the suit against you unreasonably goes forward, or if the attempts to collect the fraudulent debt don’t stop. Even if you’re citing federal law (for example, this one [pdf]), your cross-complaint can be filed in the state court hearing the suit against you; you also have the option to request that the suit be removed to federal court, and still include state claims.

This Groundhog Day, if you see your shadow in the form of someone pretending to be you, give the Mlnarik Law Group a call.  We’ll whack those debt collectors back into the hole where they belong, but for you the winter of your discontent will be over.

- Jim Erickson, Associate Attorney


Mlnarik Law Group Inspires Policy Review by FTC and U.S. Dept. of Justice

Inspired by correspondence from the Mlnarik Law Group, the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection and the Department of Justice’s Office for Victims of Crime are in the process of reviewing an important aspect of Identity Theft protocols.

In fact, the matter is so significant that the agencies intend to meet with both the International Association of Chiefs of Police and also Experian (one of the Big Three credit reporting agencies). Together, they hope to address the issue raised by the Mlnarik Law Group: how and whether Identity Theft victims may file police reports online.

Credit reporting agencies require a valid police report in responding to claims of Identity Theft. However, there is some uncertainty as to whether an online report is valid, particularly given a preference that police reports include an officer’s badge number. Also, even though a given police department (for example, San Jose’s) posts an online warning that making a false report is a crime, this might not be considered as strong as the warning provided by a police officer in person.

Unfortunately, however, some victims complain that their local police department or sheriff’s office refuses to take their police report. Such complaints are especially troublesome given the fact that the legal definition of “Identity Theft victim” is not met in some states unless a victim makes a report.

This is a crucial aspect of Identity Theft policy in a digital world. The FTC agent who responded to the Mlnarik Law Group’s concerns is to be commended for so quickly taking such decisive action.


Chinese New Year 2012: Year of the Dragon | Good Fortune

To help you find fortune in the New Year, several customs and traditions are to be followed. Chinese New Year is the longest and most important festivity in the Chinese calendar.

A must-have in every Chinese household during Chinese New Year is a plate of nian gao (new year cake).  It symbolizes continuous prosperity in the new year.  But nian gao is only one of many New Year desserts.  A personal favorite of mine are sesame balls, which come in all sizes and whose filling may be sweet or savory.  These delicious treats resemble gold nuggets, so naturally they symbolize money and wealth.

I loved celebrating Chinese New Year as a child, not only because of the good food but also because it was lucrative!  It is a long-standing tradition that married adults give hong bao (“lucky money”) to children and unmarried people to wish them good luck in the New Year.  What other holiday allows a child to make a whopping $200 in a matter of hours? 

Alas, the loot wasn’t in my hands for long:  I had to give it to my mother for “safe keeping.”  As an eight-year-old, I didn’t understand her reasoning.  Why can’t I spend all my money on candy and toys?  What do you mean I have to learn to save?  Now as an adult I realize it was her way of teaching me to be a financially responsible person.

For some of us, it’s second nature to overspend.  In order to control my “natural” instinct to buy not one but two pair of pumps whenever there’s a mad sale at Nordstrom, I incorporate restraint and awareness into my daily routine.  Before I make that purchase I have to be aware of what I really need and how much I can afford.  If I realize I neither need nor can afford the extra pair, I will invoke the gods of restraint to help me turn away from that sales rack.

I have my mother to thank for teaching me the importance of smart spending.  For those who are still learning the ropes of financial responsibility and finding it difficult, do not get frustrated.  There are many methods and resources to put your financial house in order.  The right solution for you may be as simple as cutting down your consumption of gourmet coffee or the like — but if it’s a lot more complicated than that, you may need professional advice in order to get a fresh start on your finances.  We at the Mlnarik Law Group specialize in providing such assistance.  Give us a call and we’ll help you find the right direction and ultimately enjoy the fruits of your own hong bao.

Sun Lin Fai Lok to all!  May the New Year bring you prosperity and good fortune!

- Angie Tong, Bankruptcy Attorney